Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): Geomatics and Environmental Engineering

Date Log

Submitted
Jan 12, 2019
Accepted
Jul 2, 2019
Published
Mar 13, 2020
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

3D Technologies as the Future of Spatial Planning: the Example of Krakow

https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2020.14.1.15
Agnieszka Bieda
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Department of Geomatics, Krakow, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-5960
Jarosław Bydłosz
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Department of Geomatics, Krakow, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-8112
Piotr Parzych
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Department of Geomatics, Krakow, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1978
Katarína Pukanská
Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and GIS, Faculty of Mining, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-7691
Ewelina Wójciak
ESW Wycena Nieruchomości, Krakow, Poland

Corresponding Author(s) : Agnieszka Bieda

bieda@agh.edu.pl

Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): Geomatics and Environmental Engineering

Abstract

The main goal of the paper is to make a general assessment of the application of 3D technologies in spatial planning. It was performed with the city of Krakow as the case study. The paper describes the outline of the spatial planning system in Poland and the planning conditions of Krakow. The data obtained from laser scanning for Krakow are also briefly characterized. The possibility of using these data for locating high-rise buildings in terms of the protection of Krakow´s panorama and within two programs "œIT system of the Country´s Protection Against Extreme Hazards" (ISOK) and "œIntegrated spatial data monitoring system for air quality improvement in Krakow" (MONIT-AIR) were analyzed in the paper. The main result of the research is the assessment of what studies or measurements may be used to meet particular spatial planning needs or requirements.

Keywords

spatial planning urban planning 3D modelling Krakow Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)
Bieda, A., Bydłosz, J., Parzych, P., Pukanská, K., & Wójciak, E. (2020). 3D Technologies as the Future of Spatial Planning: the Example of Krakow. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 14(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2020.14.1.15
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Van Assche K., Beunen R., Duineveld M., de Jong H: Co‑evolutions of planning and design: Risks and benefits of design perspectives in planning systems. Planning Theory, vol. 12(2), 2013, pp. 177–198.
  2. Lagopoulos A.P.: Clarifying Theoretical and Applied Land‑Use Planning Concepts. Urban Science, vol. 2(1), 2018, p. 17.
  3. Pettit C.J., Cartwright W., Berry M.: Geographical visualization: A participatory planning support tool for imagining landscape futures. Applied GIS, vol. 2(3), 2006, pp. 22.1–22.16.
  4. Batty M., Chapman D., Evans S., Haklay M., Kueppers S., Shiode N., Smith A., Torrens P.M.: Visualizing the City: Communicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision‑Makers. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, London 2000.
  5. Biljecki F., Stoter J., Ledoux H., Zlatanova S., Çöltekin A.: Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 4, 2015, pp. 2842–2889.
  6. Ranzinger M., Gleixner G.: GIS datasets for 3D urban planning. Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 21(2), 1997, pp. 159–173.
  7. Pullar D.V., Tidey M.E.: Coupling 3D visualisation to qualitative assessment of built environment designs. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 55(1), 2001, pp. 29–40.
  8. Appleton K., Lovett A.: GIS‑based visualisation of rural landscapes: Defining “sufficient” realism for environmental decision‑making. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 65(3), 2003, pp. 117–131.
  9. Métral, C., Falquet G., Vonlanthen M.: An ontology‑based model for urban planning communication. [in:] Teller J., Lee J.R., Roussey C. (eds.), Ontologies for Urban Development, Studies in Computational Intelligence, 69, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 61–72.
  10. Kibria M.S., Zlatanova S., Itard L., Dorst M.: GeoVEs as tools to communicate in urban projects: Requirements for functionality and visualization. [in:] Lee J., Zlatanova S. (eds.), 3D Geo‑Information Sciences, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 379–395.
  11. Benner J., Geiger A., Häfele K.H.: Concept for building licensing based on stan‑ dardized 3D geo information. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-4/W15, 2010, pp. 9–12.
  12. Isikdag U., Zlatanova S.: Interactive modelling of buildings in Google Earth: A 3D tool for Urban Planning. [in:] Neutens T., de Maeyer Ph. (eds.), Develop‑ ments in 3D Geo‑Information Sciences, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 52–70.
  13. Moser J., Albrecht F., Kosar B.: Beyond visualization – 3D GIS analyses for virtual city models. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Re- mote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-4/W15, 2010, pp. 143–146.
  14. Guney C., Akdag Girginkaya S., Cagdas G., Yavuz S.: Tailoring a geomodel for analyzing an urban skyline. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 105(1–2), 2012, pp. 160–173.
  15. Lewis J.L., Casello J.M., Groulx M.: Effective environmental visualization for urban planning and design: interdisciplinary reflections on a rapidly evolving technology. Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 19(3), 2012, pp. 85–106.
  16. Czyńska K., Rubinowicz P.: Application of 3D virtual city models in urban analyses of tall buildings – Today practice and future challenges. Architecture et Artibus, vol. 19, 2014, pp. 9–13.
  17. Lu S., Wang F.: Computer aided design system based on 3D GIS for park design. [in:] Hsiang-Chuan Liu, Wen-Pei Sung, Wenli Yao (eds.), Computer, Intelligent Computing and Education Technology, CRC Press, London 2014, pp. 413–416.
  18. Kaňuk J., Gallay M., Hofierka J.: Generating time series of virtual 3‑D city models using a retrospective approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 139, 2015, pp. 40–53.
  19. Leszek K.: Environmental and urban spatial analysis based on a 3D city model. [in:] Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2015, Theoretical Computer Science and General Issues, 9155, Springer International Publishing, New York 2015, pp. 633–645.
  20. Bydłosz J., Bieda A., Parzych P.: The Implementation of Spatial Planning Objects in a 3D Cadastral Model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 7(4), art. no. 153, pp. 1–14.
  21. Kwartnik-Pruc A., Przewięźlikowska A.: Porównanie funkcjonowania planowania przestrzennego w Polsce iw Niemczech. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 1(3), 2007, pp. 149–160.
  22. Cieślak I.: Analiza systemu planowania przestrzennego we Francji w nawiązaniu do systemu polskiego. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Administratio Locorum, vol. 9(2), 2010, pp. 5–16.
  23. Golej J.: Porovnanie systémov územného plánovania v Taliansku a na Slovensku. Nehnuteľnosti a Bývanie, no. 1, 2012, pp. 27–37.
  24. Topczewska T.: Integrated planning of development and revitalisation of cities in selected countries of the European union and in Poland. Człowiek i Środowisko, t. 36(3), 2012, pp. 21–40.
  25. Krajewska M., Źróbek S., Kovač M.Š.: The role of spatial planning in the invest‑ ment process in Poland and Slovenia. Real Estate Management and Valuation, vol. 22(2), 2014, pp. 52–66.
  26. Tölle A.: Zintegrowane formy planowania i zarządzania rozwojem lokalnym a in‑ strumentarium planistyczne – system polski na tle systemu niemieckiego. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, nr 3(57), 2014, pp. 60–76.
  27. Pawlikowska E., Popek P., Bieda A., Moteva M., Stoeva A.: Analysis of the Legal Methods of Agricultural Land Protection in Central Europe on the Example of Poland and Bulgaria. Real Estate Management and Valuation, vol. 25(2), 2017, pp. 58–71.
  28. Bieda A., Pukanská K., Sala B.: Spatial planning in localities with special historic values on examples of Poland and Slovakia. Geomatics and Environmental Engi- neering, vol. 12(1), 2018, pp. 5–27.
  29. Koreleski K.: The system of spatial planning and land management in Poland. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 3(2), 2009, pp. 27–42.
  30. Balawejder M., Matkowska K., Colak H.E.: The impact of surveying works on the Development of Smart City. [in:] Ćwiąkała P., Kwartnik-Pruc A., Puniach E. (eds.), “GIS ODYSSEY 2018”: geographic information systems conference and exhibition: 25th anniversary conference: 10th to 14th of September 2018, Perugia, Italy: conference proceedings, Croatian Information Technology Society – GIS Forum, Zagreb 2018, pp. 20–32.
  31. Ustawa z dnia 27 marca 2003 r. o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym. Tekst jednolity: Dz. U. 2018 poz. 1945 z późn. zm. [The Act of March 27, 2003, on planning and spatial development. Consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2018, item 1945 as amended].
  32. Kraków w liczbach 2017 [Krakow in numbers 2017], http://www.bip.krakow.pl/plik.php?zid=215089&wer=0&new=t&mode=shw [access: 15.11.2018].
  33. GUS – Bank Danych Lokalnych [Statistics Poland – Local Data Bank], https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start [access: 15.11.2018].
  34. Planowanie Przestrzenne – BIP MK – Urząd Miasta Krakowa [Planning Bureau of the City of Krakow], http://www.bip.krakow.pl/?id=412 [access: 15.11.2018].
  35. Bieda A., Parzych P.: Development of spatial politics of monumental towns based on Krakow example. [in:] SGEM 2013: GeoConference on Informatics, geoinformatics and remote sensing: 13th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference: 16–22, June, 2013, Albena, Bulgaria: conference proceedings. vol. 2, Geodesy and mine surveying; Photogrammetry and remote sensing, STEF92 Technology, Sofia 2013, pp. 143–150.
  36. Jędrychowski I.: Numeryczny model zespołów urbanistycznych w Krakowie. Roczniki Geomatyki – Annals of Geomatics, vol. 5(8), 2007, pp. 199–203.
  37. Zięba K., Wężyk P. Wykorzystanie danych lotniczego skanowania laserowego (ALS) oraz analiz widoczności GIS do oceny przemian krajobrazu warownego Twierdzy Kraków. Roczniki Geomatyki – Annals of Geomatics, vol. 5(75), 2017, pp. 627–638.
  38. Wężyk P. (ed.): Podręcznik dla uczestników szkoleń z wykorzystania produktów LiDAR. Główny Urząd Geodezji i Kartografii, Warszawa 2015.
  39. Możliwości lokalizacji obiektów wysokościowych w aspekcie ochrony panoramy miasta Krakowa – analiza [Possibility of locating high‑rise buildings in terms of protection city of Krakow panorama], http://www.bip.krakow.pl/?dok_id=28466 [access: 15.11.2018].
  40. Atlas pokrycia terenu i przewietrzania Krakowa [Land Cover and Ventilation Atlas of Krakow], http://progea4d.pl/atlas-pokrycia-terenu-i-przewietrzania-krakowa [access: 15.11.2018].
  41. Hydroportal publikujący mapy zagrożenia powodziowego i mapy ryzyka powodziowego w formacie PDF, http://mapy.isok.gov.pl/imap/ [access: 15.11.2018].
  42. Adamczyk T., Bieda A.: Intended Use of Real Estate as a Time Changeable Attribute for Determining Compensation for Nationalized and Expropriated Lands. Real Estate Management and Valuation, vol. 22(4), 2014, pp. 35–50.
  43. Bieda A., Jasińska E.: Analysis of land exposed to the destructive activities of surface water flowing. [in:] FIG Commission 3: joint FIG/UN ECE workshop: workshop on Spatial information and FIG task force on Property and housing, and 2012 UNECE WPLA workshop on Informal development, property and housing: Athens, Greece, 10–14 December 2012, Greece, 2012.
  44. Bieda A., Bieda A.: Renewable energy in the system of spatial planning in Poland. [in:] Adamczyk T., Dębińska E. (eds.), “GIS ODYSSEY 2017”: Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition: 4th to 8th of September 2017, Trento – Vattaro, Italy: conference proceedings, Croatian Information Technology Society – GIS Forum, Zagreb 2017, pp. 28–42.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 546 Download : 315

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

 

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)